Penance on a pittance

Sunday 15th January 2012

DOLE, many still call it: unemployment benefit, the legal provision of which is enshrined in the National Insurance Act of 1911, though the centenary seemed to pass by without comment or celebration. Paupers previously had to rely for welfare upon begging, parish relief, and the homely, fireside welcome of that great British institution, the workhouse.

Etymologists tell us ‘dole’ comes from the Old English dál, or ‘deal’. In imperial Rome, it was grain, handed out free to plebeians. That the Latin verb dolere means ‘to suffer pain or grief’ is entirely coincidental.

An intern was, until recently, an ‘assistant resident physician or surgeon in a hospital.’

It’s all been rather sneaky, in my view: the gradual shift from means-tested entitlement to income support to begrudging allowance to the latest initiative:

“If you don’t do as you’re told and spend a fortnight stacking shelves in Poundland, you’ll get bugger all.”

It’s no surprise that certain supermarkets, food and drink corporations, oil companies and banks have all quickly offered salvation to the country’s one million unemployed youngsters. The ‘deal’ goes as follows.

The government will give you £53 a week to live on as long as you do their bidding. This now includes a mandatory period of ‘training’ with a large employer, who will get your labour for nothing. They might offer you a job interview, but are under no obligation to do so.

And why should they? Cheaper and easier to wait for the next batch of unpaid trainees to arrive. As neat a wheeze as any I’ve come across for helping wealthy companies become even wealthier.

It’s tough being unemployed. Most people not only lose heart and self-confidence, but also feel inadequate and ashamed. And now this.

Call it what you will – internship, work experience, condition of benefit payment or job seekers’ penance – the practice of paying anybody nothing in return for their labour is insulting, demeaning and disgraceful.

Compassion? Past its sell-by date, it seems.



This entry was posted in journal. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Penance on a pittance

  1. Miki Byrne. says:

    A very concise and accurate analysis of this very sad state of affairs. Guilt drives people into non-productive, for them anyway, schemes. It puts me in mind of some of those YTS/YOPS things. I wish everday/average people would take a realistic view to government selection. Thanks Marcus.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s